View Full Version : God dammit..
GMorrison
01-05-2008, 08:35 AM
GoW arrived today so I booted it up to play , it said it needs an update so I clicked ''Yes'' but because Live is a *** it doesn't update , it gives me an error..so now i'm doomed to playing campaign :(
Spyder 232
01-05-2008, 10:38 AM
Another thing which proves M$ has completly screwed live up, Again.
GamerSince'76
01-05-2008, 10:44 AM
It will get resolved. MS will give members an arcade game. It is a pain in the arse to have that happen. IMHO just keep trying. GoW is awesome. You are going to love it.
Ainokeatoo-XBA
01-05-2008, 12:19 PM
Gow is outdated and overrated IMHO. It's like a second halo 3 in which it attracts immature children that think it's funny to act like an ass.
Variation-XBA
01-05-2008, 03:03 PM
Another thing which proves M$ has completly screwed live up, Again.
Awesome, a baby Crazy Couger!
GoW arrived today so I booted it up to play , it said it needs an update so I clicked ''Yes'' but because Live is a *** it doesn't update , it gives me an error..so now i'm doomed to playing campaign :(
It's just because of the LIVE issues these past 2 weeks. I was getting the same thing and found if you just tried to redo it a few times, sometimes it would kick in. I also cleared my HD's cache to see if it would help too.
ChorusOfAngels
01-05-2008, 04:05 PM
Gow is outdated and overrated IMHO. It's like a second halo 3 in which it attracts immature children that think it's funny to act like an ass.
Outdated? IMO it's still one of the best looking games on 360.
Overrated? Two words. Halo 3.
GMorrison
01-05-2008, 04:44 PM
Thanks for the reply's , I got the game at 2PM and I finally got it done at 6/7 :( It's amazing , I don't know why you think it's overrated , many of the games today don't measure up to the standards set by GoW.
GamerSince'76
01-05-2008, 04:50 PM
Thanks for the reply's , I got the game at 2PM and I finally got it done at 6/7 :( It's amazing , I don't know why you think it's overrated , many of the games today don't measure up to the standards set by GoW.
If you have trouble in single player later in the game, let me know. When Gears came out I couldn't beat one boss. I traded the game in frustration and recently bought it again. Then I figured out how to beat that boss and blasted him away. It's different than what the guide books say but it's easier.
Many games out today don't look as good graphically as Gears and the Active Reload is brilliant. There is nothing outdated about Gears.
Ainokeatoo-XBA
01-05-2008, 11:19 PM
Outdated? IMO it's still one of the best looking games on 360.
Overrated? Two words. Halo 3.
Actually, Halo 3 is perfectly rated, the campaign is fun the graphics are second to none, online is normally fun minus the screaming children.
Outdated yes, Crackdown looks better, halo 3 looks better, Mass Effect looks better, Two worlds would look better if it wasn't for the crappy frame rate, Hell Naruto: Rise of a ninja's cell shading is awesome... And I think it's the first cell shaded game on 360... I think.
BROOKLYNSBATMAN
01-08-2008, 11:50 AM
Gow is outdated and overrated IMHO. It's like a second halo 3 in which it attracts immature children that think it's funny to act like an ass.
Yeah sure overrated... in what way... show me a game where you can do half the things u can do in gears... also if its so ""overrated" then why are other companys trying to aquire the same rights to use unreal engine in there projects and the one botton technology to do diffrent tasks in the game.. the online still hasnt been beated and continues to dominate ... what call of duty 4 or halo 3, u think that beats Gears of War... halo 3's online is a complete washed down version of halo 2 with suckier maps.. or COD 4 where u cant even have friends come over and play as guest.. get with it Gears has more strategy than both of those... i dont even need a headset when i play halo 3 or COD 4 (its just a shoot em up game. no strategy needed) ... the only thing your right about is it does attrack immature children... but halo 3 is a breading grown for it as well as Cod 4 so thats a problem that has no fix, its only a matter of time before..., kids younger than 18 go on mature games..
GMorrison
01-08-2008, 04:49 PM
I'm pretty sure you can have guests play with you on COD4 , me and my friend did it..
JakofallAces
01-08-2008, 06:00 PM
Gow is outdated and overrated IMHO. It's like a second halo 3 in which it attracts immature children that think it's funny to act like an ass.
Hey just cause some kids are immature freaks there still are enough grown up a$$holes. I cant tell you how many games i have been b1tched on by 20+ guys about my voice or skill so just cause little kids are annoying doesnt mean that all you "Adults" aren't also.
Also about microsoft i do understand the problems because at my school all the seniors in my grade got xbox live 30+ people. Also before christmas there was only 6 million Live members after christmas 10 million Live members, no one could have predicted that much of a jump. And hey a free game is all right with me. Gow is great and so is single player so dont feel so bad about the belated update.
ChorusOfAngels
01-08-2008, 09:21 PM
Actually, Halo 3 is perfectly rated, the campaign is fun the graphics are second to none, online is normally fun minus the screaming children.
Outdated yes, Crackdown looks better, halo 3 looks better, Mass Effect looks better, Two worlds would look better if it wasn't for the crappy frame rate, Hell Naruto: Rise of a ninja's cell shading is awesome... And I think it's the first cell shaded game on 360... I think.
Yes because cell shading definitely looks better than GoW. Whatever man.
And Halo 3 is overrated. There really is nothing special about it, and it doesn't take much skill in comparison to Gears
Ainokeatoo-XBA
01-09-2008, 04:16 AM
Yeah sure overrated... in what way... show me a game where you can do half the things u can do in gears... also if its so ""overrated" then why are other companys trying to aquire the same rights to use unreal engine in there projects and the one botton technology to do diffrent tasks in the game.. the online still hasnt been beated and continues to dominate ... what call of duty 4 or halo 3, u think that beats Gears of War... halo 3's online is a complete washed down version of halo 2 with suckier maps.. or COD 4 where u cant even have friends come over and play as guest.. get with it Gears has more strategy than both of those... i dont even need a headset when i play halo 3 or COD 4 (its just a shoot em up game. no strategy needed) ... the only thing your right about is it does attrack immature children... but halo 3 is a breading grown for it as well as Cod 4 so thats a problem that has no fix, its only a matter of time before..., kids younger than 18 go on mature games..
What can you do in gears that's not done in any other game? Who said gow's online dominates anything? Its basically the same as Rainbow Six. Yes you can have guests on cod. Gears has more strategy? I find that hilarious, infact I find that so hilarious as it's nearly the same as halo 3 other than the fact that instead of being dropped to the ground with a chance to get up, your shields go down and someone has to shoot you to kill you. What strategy does GoW have other than point shoot, shoot, shoot some more and hope you kill him.
You start out basically the same, ****ty weapons then you have to go find your weapons on the map, what does THAT remind me of? Oh, possibly halo. When it lags you're basically screwed, there is absolutely no chance whatsoever, where as in rainbow six you have a chance. There are games better than GoW hate to break it to you, but there are. Gears of war can't be taken seriously because really it's almost like a second halo.
Yes because cell shading definitely looks better than GoW. Whatever man.
And Halo 3 is overrated. There really is nothing special about it, and it doesn't take much skill in comparison to Gears
Yes, it does actually, a complete world that even looks better than it's anime counterpart? That's an extremely well put together *graphically and gameplay wise* game. Seriously, what skill does gears or halo 3 have? You shoot, shoot, shoot some more and hope you get a kill. Really there is no REAL strategy in either game, other than deciding where one side goes what you and your team mates do first go first or pick up first.
WARTH0G DRIVER
01-09-2008, 02:34 PM
I'm pretty sure you can have guests play with you on COD4 , me and my friend did it..
lies...:whistle:
BROOKLYNSBATMAN
01-13-2008, 08:29 PM
What can you do in gears that's not done in any other game? Who said gow's online dominates anything? Its basically the same as Rainbow Six. Yes you can have guests on cod. Gears has more strategy? I find that hilarious, infact I find that so hilarious as it's nearly the same as halo 3 other than the fact that instead of being dropped to the ground with a chance to get up, your shields go down and someone has to shoot you to kill you. What strategy does GoW have other than point shoot, shoot, shoot some more and hope you kill him.
You start out basically the same, ****ty weapons then you have to go find your weapons on the map, what does THAT remind me of? Oh, possibly halo. When it lags you're basically screwed, there is absolutely no chance whatsoever, where as in rainbow six you have a chance. There are games better than GoW hate to break it to you, but there are. Gears of war can't be taken seriously because really it's almost like a second halo.
Yes, it does actually, a complete world that even looks better than it's anime counterpart? That's an extremely well put together *graphically and gameplay wise* game. Seriously, what skill does gears or halo 3 have? You shoot, shoot, shoot some more and hope you get a kill. Really there is no REAL strategy in either game, other than deciding where one side goes what you and your team mates do first go first or pick up first.
And what strategy does halo 3 or cod 4 offer thats better than gears... and i find myself needing to talk to my team members in gears to know if they see the other guy or if we're gonna plan an ambush.. please in cod 4 who claims there modern war fare, its so modern i cant even duk behinde, a log or a rock or atleast peek out the side doors, same goes for halo im a super human half robot half human and i cant duk lol be serious, and im not saying that halo 3 or cod 4 arent great game but in my opinion for the 4th edition of one and the 3rd edition of another...,gears of war which is the first edition of its
franchise is honestly giving you a bit more realism in war...
and honestly I've never played any rainbow six games... or seen them being played and if its anything like ghost recon im glad ive never had the pleasure on wasting my money on it.
the only one step that cod 4 has that i dont see any other game having is the fact that you can call an air raid, but as far as strategy goes Gears is the best out of cod or halo... like i said before cod i go on no headset run around average about 18-22 kills halo 3 is soooo boorring after 4 games but again i dont need strategy, Gears has its faults i'll agree but the other two in my eyes dont beat it... and i know im not alone.. as far as strategy goes..., i think gears has this two games beat..., and no u cant enter your friends as guest atleast not with my system , the only way i've seen people play together on the same box is diffrent accounts.. and before anyone goes than dont play them if you hate them.. i dont hate halo and i dont hate cod.., i own them... i just dont think they beat gears online..., gears has its flaw but so does every other one ... wait till gears 2 people will be on Gears d**k again,....
Ainokeatoo-XBA
01-14-2008, 12:02 AM
What does ducking have that adds realisim? You can crouch in both halo and cod, and you can even go prone in cod 4. Snipers aren't visible which is how they should be, you don't necessarily have to shoot your whole clip into someone before they even go down in cod. Halo is basically the same as gears at the start of the match but minus the respawning, I mean hell, you start the game with retarded weapons and have to run all over the map looking for weapons and trying not to get killed because you know you're not coming back to life.
CoD4 IS nearly exactly like modern warfare and lives up to it's name, honestly, what strategy does GoW have? Go out and try not to die because if you die you're no use? And the hammer, yeah, that made things even worse. I never saw strategy in gow sorry, but I didn't... That and Rainbow easily beats gow in strategy, Rainbow plays nothing like Ghost recon.
BROOKLYNSBATMAN
01-14-2008, 11:21 AM
What does ducking have that adds realisim? You can crouch in both halo and cod, and you can even go prone in cod 4. Snipers aren't visible which is how they should be, you don't necessarily have to shoot your whole clip into someone before they even go down in cod. Halo is basically the same as gears at the start of the match but minus the respawning, I mean hell, you start the game with retarded weapons and have to run all over the map looking for weapons and trying not to get killed because you know you're not coming back to life.
CoD4 IS nearly exactly like modern warfare and lives up to it's name, honestly, what strategy does GoW have? Go out and try not to die because if you die you're no use? And the hammer, yeah, that made things even worse. I never saw strategy in gow sorry, but I didn't... That and Rainbow easily beats gow in strategy, Rainbow plays nothing like Ghost recon.
Are you kidding me man.., (by the way i love this debate lol)
anyways... cod 4 and youll agree is retarded, that you no matter the ranking when signed on the first time, the other players have better wepons than you atleast in gears and halo everything is equal.. i didnt know in a real war you couldnt side peek or take cover and blind shoot... cause in cod it lacks that...step.., although the AI can do it and kill you, we cant.. its bullsht.. and honestly wat strategy does cod 4 offer better than gears you get one chance in each round in gears not to die ... in cod i can die all i like, i respawn and respawn and go running around and shoot here and there boom 18 kills .. like nothing gears you gotta work a lot harder to get someone with the wepons they offer... the only thing cod 4 has better than gears is the sniping in that, there a lot more real i will agree with you. but besides that cod has nothing on gears, infact i should make a thread to see wat people enjoyed more.., when it came out gears or cod4 .. and now do u think if cod 4 came out when gears did you'd think they would of won game of the year... cause i seriously highly doubt it.. cause its been over a year now and gears is still being played and bought like crazy ... sorry im getting outside of the topic of realism ..
in my opinion man you can defend cod 4 all you like( i respect that its your opinion, however) ..,i just cant see it your way about cod being more strategic you literaly shoot and hide shoot and hide its a lot more fast pased you could die like 10 times so your a lot less careless of dying.. in gears your almost to the point of paranoid when you fight cause its a life per round... so youll be more strategic on attacks... thats the way i see it.. i mean i got marine buddies who agree with me about it not being realistic.. the wepons are realistic ill point that out now but not the tactic nor the strategy you have to provide in order to win..
Also i wasnt debating, rainbow six i never played it ill rent it when the new one comes out to give it a chance but the game wasnt a big hit like gears was to me ... i herd good things but.. not enough to make me want the game..
Ainokeatoo-XBA
01-14-2008, 04:45 PM
Cod is an all out modern war fighting game, you don't need to hide behind walls what not, yet, I didn't know in a warish type of game such as gears of war, with their powerful weapons, that they couldn't shoot through obviously shoot through able objects. Thin walls whatnot, as for the fairness in weapon choice, just because you have to unlock better guns, doesn't mean the guns you start out with suck. I can go 20-10 with the starting Sub-Machine gun, it's how you use the gun. Also, as far as strategy goes, you use your teammates to your advantage, they're your scouts, where they get killed is where either you don't go or you go to for kills. You rely on your team mates to give you what you need when you need it. Also, for clan matches, you need bodies? Coordinate your team to take guns, you need snipers? Coordinate your team to get snipers, you need moveable snipers? Have your snipers take an auto/semi-automatic weapon and a sniper.
Strategy doesn't necessarily only mean respawn die kill whatever, that's actually part of certain strategies. ALSO In all fairness, cod4, if it came out around gears, it'd most likely outsell gears, seeing as it's multi-platform.
BROOKLYNSBATMAN
01-15-2008, 06:52 AM
Cod is an all out modern war fighting game, you don't need to hide behind walls what not, yet, I didn't know in a warish type of game such as gears of war, with their powerful weapons, that they couldn't shoot through obviously shoot through able objects. Thin walls whatnot, as for the fairness in weapon choice, just because you have to unlock better guns, doesn't mean the guns you start out with suck. I can go 20-10 with the starting Sub-Machine gun, it's how you use the gun. Also, as far as strategy goes, you use your teammates to your advantage, they're your scouts, where they get killed is where either you don't go or you go to for kills. You rely on your team mates to give you what you need when you need it. Also, for clan matches, you need bodies? Coordinate your team to take guns, you need snipers? Coordinate your team to get snipers, you need moveable snipers? Have your snipers take an auto/semi-automatic weapon and a sniper.
Strategy doesn't necessarily only mean respawn die kill whatever, that's actually part of certain strategies. ALSO In all fairness, cod4, if it came out around gears, it'd most likely outsell gears, seeing as it's multi-platform.
Dude i think we're gonna agree to disagree... in real war you hide all the time, ever herd of fox holes, or malitia,(strategic men using the elements to suprise and ambush enemies)and especialy in a middle eastern war, we always practice strategic hiding and blending in the mornings in the core right after pt.( physical training) not only that but the strategy you mentioned with snipers are used all the time in gear matches. in clan matches in both games... gears to me seems to be the one i have to be more strategic..., cause its a big diffrence when you can respawn all the time..., towards only getting 1 life per round.and in gears if i die i leave 3 guys in a uneven fight in cod 4 i dont see that. even the way cod4 was designed shows it doesnt even matter how many people you got, im always in a uneven match.and about the wepon thing its bullsht cause when i started out i actualy use to shoot all the time, with the automatic oozies and it wouldnt kill the guy quickly even though a whole clip was emptyd on a guy he would turn around shoot me with his supped up automatic and i died its bull... the only thing i can say sucks about gears in the start was hosting but atleast id know there would be a host running around if i wasnt the host. if cod4 came out when gears did it wouldnt of out sold them there multi platform now they havnt beaten them in sales yet... and gears broke i think there million mile mark in about month and half when it came out.. so i dont realy
think cod4 would of beaten gears... and what i said wasnt ment towards sales it was ment towards which is the better game.. and who would of won best game of the year.. if released at the same time. but none the less i think you and i will agree to disagree other wise we're just gonna keep going back and forth...
Ninjermy
02-10-2008, 10:17 PM
COD4 and GOW both pwn. Period.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.