PDA

View Full Version : ECA Petitioning Violent Game Case



LINKINPARK8591
05-12-2010, 05:35 PM
Gamers asked to submit signatures for U.S. Supreme Court hearing.
The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA), a non-profit membership group that represents the gaming community, is collecting signatures from gamers to submit to the U.S. Supreme Court as it plans to hear California's proposed violent videogame law.

The law, signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2005, would make it illegal for retailers to sell violent games to anyone under 18 years old. The hearing isn't expected to take place until the court's next term starting this October.

Along with the petition, the ECA will also include an amicus brief, a document that can be filed by a third party not involved with the case to inform and assist the court's decision.

"The gaming sector, as a whole, has arrived at perhaps the single most important challenge it has ever faced in the U.S.," said Hal Halpin, President of the ECA. "The medium itself and how it, the trade, and its consumers will be perceived for the long term is at stake. Anyone who cares about gaming should feel compelled to both sign the petition and encourage their friends and family to do similarly."

"These documents will provide the court with one clear collective voice with which to vocalize our position and reinforce that we agree with the lower court findings: games, like music and movies, are protected free speech."

If you're interested in signing the petition, head on over the ECA's

official website. (http://action.theeca.com/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1781)


ummm......Parents would still continue to purchase there young under age kids these violent video games. I don't know how many times i walk into the store and see a little kid pointing out a game and the parent gets it, no questions asked about it's content. Hell half the time it's been something like MW2 or some other violent game.

wicked_d365
05-12-2010, 05:53 PM
I agree with the law. It should be enforced just like if you were buy cigarettes or alcohol. The rating says 17 and up, you should be 17 to buy it.

There are alot of kids who should no be playing some of the games they ar playing. If I had a kid, I wouldn't let him/her play GTA like I did at 14. That game is ment for the mature audience and should stay that way. If a parent decides to buy it for their kid then that is their problem and they can deal with the fallout. If you buy your kid nothing but M rated games and they turn out to be crazy, guess who's fault that is? Yours for not paying attention.

You can't get into an R rated movie under 17 and you have to be older than 21 to buy more than two tickets to them. I know, I use to have to check ID's for movies at the door because parents would buy tickets for R rated movies and let their kids go alone.

These games/movies have been rated for a reason. People need to listen to the ratings and stop complaining.

LINKINPARK8591
05-12-2010, 06:03 PM
well I agree with it but like i said kids are still going to be able to get a hold of these one way or another. yeah at that point it boils down to parents.

Ainokeatoo
05-12-2010, 10:32 PM
I don't agree with this law, what is classified as a "Violent Video Game"? I mean, half of the perfectly fine games here are banned in Australia. No film gets this kind of treatment, sure maybe pornographic films, but a kid can switch on HBO at midnight if he really wanted to. All those R rated movies, they end up on cable television so any "underaged" kid in america with basic cable can access these movies. Should we start banning Cable companies on what they broadcast? I don't think so.

Sure it's a nice thought, children should not be buying mature games, but then again, say it's a seventeen year old's birthday tomorrow, what makes him any more mature tomorrow than he would be today? Today he can't buy mature rated games, tomorrow he can, that makes no sense to me. What we have now is code of ethics, retailers don't normally sell M rated games to anyone under eighteen, this is working perfectly fine as it is. If the person can't buy it him/herself, her/his parents will normally buy it for them.

Fargoth
05-12-2010, 11:05 PM
I'm 17 now so.... I don't honestly care although one of the reasons I stopped playing multiplayer games was because everyone online was pissing me off main body being 12-13 year olds

Ainokeatoo
05-13-2010, 12:39 AM
I'm 17 now so.... I don't honestly care although one of the reasons I stopped playing multiplayer games was because everyone online was pissing me off main body being 12-13 year olds

I blame the parents :P majority of the time that body of people have their parents buying their video games, so yeah I blame the parents.

Symmetric-XBA
05-15-2010, 04:03 PM
Its a parent's responsibility to induce manners, right and wrong, respect and discipline to their children. I don't find fault w/ parents who buy M+ rated games for their kids, as long as they take the responsiblity for regulating it. Ultimately it falls into the parent's hands b/c I feel that its their own decision on what games, their kids can and can not play.