This perhaps deserves its own thread but I'll post it here.
Some excerpts from an article on EA and Live.
Quote:
EA Pres.-COO John Riccitiello later told analysts “the reason we’re not supporting Xbox Live in our judgment is in the short term, it doesn’t look good, and in the long term it could theoretically have very bad strategic consequences for our profitability on that platform, where we own the consumer [experience] directly [without] an intermediary and frankly that there’s” way EA can charge customer some kind of fee. He said: “It’s hard to believe the consumer will give us a fee after having already paid Microsoft a fee. So, we need to shift that [business] model and we’re working with Microsoft to see that that happens.”
Quote:
But Microsoft Xbox Live Gen. Mgr. Cameron Ferroni said his company was convinced it could “succeed without them” in online console gaming. He said revenue wasn’t real issue, asking rhetorically what kind of revenue EA and other 3rd-party publishers were getting via PS2 online strategy. As for EA’s fear of having Microsoft steal away its customers, Ferroni said: “They’ve got full access to the customer, so that [issue] never made any sense [and is] not an issue as far as I’m concerned.” He also predicted: “Ultimately, they’ll come around and do the right thing for gamers.”
Quote:
Although EA and Microsoft executives said they would continue to discuss online issue, EA made it clear that it saw enough significant opportunities via Sony’s more 3rd-party-friendly PS2 online gaming initiative that it wasn’t concerned at this point what it might be losing with absence from Xbox Live.
So basically EA is pist off because they don't make any money with Live, as in fees. They want to charge fees! They feel that since people already pay MS a yearly subscription fee, that no one will pay again to EA, which I think is pretty much true. Why should we pay them?
EA completely blows when it comes down to what is actually best for the gamer. They are the spoiled rich kid that doesn't care what or who is on the baseball card, just as long as they have them all.
I don't have a link to the full article but it was dated: WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2003 CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DAILY