Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: IBM to Work on Future Xbox chips

  1. #1
    Release The First Skill Shadow20002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    4,239

    Default IBM to Work on Future Xbox "Stuff"

    Microsoft and IBM enter into a semiconductor technology agreement for future Xbox products and services.

    Microsoft has today announced that it has entered into a semiconductor technology agreement with IBM. Under the agreement, IBM has licensed its leading-edge semiconductor processor technology to Microsoft for use in future Xbox products and services.

    "Microsoft is already developing the software and services that will drive the digital decade," said Robbie Bach, senior vice president of the home and entertainment division at Microsoft. "By combining our vision, software experience and R&D resources with IBM's computer and semiconductor technologies, we plan to deliver unprecedented and unparalleled entertainment experiences to consumers while creating new engines of growth for the technology and entertainment industries."

    Source@
    Back into the world of gaming.

  2. #2
    Fidelis Ad Mortem ScottTheKilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    260

    Default

    hmm...sounds eviiiiiil to me

  3. #3
    not not not not not sane. Cottrau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Temple Terrace, FL
    Posts
    147

    Default

    i believe AMD actually already signed a deal with them.... even though this has been posted as news on the front site.. i clearly remember a few months ago Microsoft cutting a deal with AMD to provide X2's Processor.
    got me an xbo
    PGR2: 250,000Kudos and counting.... 25 Platinum awards Hidden Content
    rawr

  4. #4
    Official Squid of XBA squid413's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Posts
    529

    Default

    thats cool, although amd might have been better, but i guess we'll know how it is when it comes out.

  5. #5

    Default

    at first i was concerned, but then i thought... this is bill gates... he will create the most powerful system... and halo 3 oh my!

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    18

    Shocked

    I have a really strong feeling that something truly amazing, one of a kind and out-right insane is going to come from this whole deal....kind of like xbox itself. the ole' cliché, "two heads are better than one" i think applies in this case, you never know, with this new deal we will probably be playing these games on line in virtual reality

    think about it chumley, halo....online.....virtual reality.....

    hold on, i need some time to myself after that thought...
    Hidden Content
    Future Games:
    Ninja Gaidan
    Freedom Fighters
    True Crime: Streets of L.A.
    Legacy of Kain but I need to get Blood Omen2 first.
    Kill Switch
    Prince of Persia: Sands of Time

  7. #7
    Filth Infatuated treyz3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    210

    Default

    I might not be a big fan of IBM, but at least they didn't sign with Apple!
    Hidden Content

    Have:
    Halo, Tetris Worlds, Ghost Recon, Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2003, NCAA 2004, Jedi Starfighter, Rainbow Six 3, Top Spin

    Want:
    Available - KOTOR
    Future - Halo 2

  8. #8
    not not not not not sane. Cottrau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Temple Terrace, FL
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Originally posted by Quidditch_King
    I have a really strong feeling that something truly amazing, one of a kind and out-right insane is going to come from this whole deal....kind of like xbox itself. the ole' cliché, "two heads are better than one" i think applies in this case, you never know, with this new deal we will probably be playing these games on line in virtual reality

    think about it chumley, halo....online.....virtual reality.....

    hold on, i need some time to myself after that thought...

    two heads are never better than one, unless they work together. Here are two examples

    Working:


    Not Working:


    i rest my case.
    got me an xbo
    PGR2: 250,000Kudos and counting.... 25 Platinum awards Hidden Content
    rawr

  9. #9
    Registered User X-Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Piscataway,Nj
    Posts
    2,059

    Default Well it appears the rumours were true ibm is powering the next xbox.

    SAN JOSE, Calif. - The next generation of Microsoft Corp.'s Xbox (news - web sites) gaming consoles will be powered by processors developed by International Business Machines Corp., according to an agreement announced Monday.

    The deal appears to be at the expense of semiconductor giant Intel Corp., whose Pentium III processors run the original Xbox that's been on the market since 2001. Microsoft is expected to release its second-generation Xbox in 2005.


    Kevin Krewell, senior editor of InStat/MDR's Microprocessor Report, said Xbox deals aren't necessarily lucrative.


    "I don't think Intel is all that serious about the gaming console business," he said. "I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a very serious proposal from Intel" on the second-generation chip deal.


    An Intel spokeswoman declined to comment.


    No details about the new chip were released, and a Microsoft spokesman did not return a telephone call seeking comment.


    IBM's new semiconductor plant in East Fishkill, N.Y., currently makes IBM's own processors, which are typically used in IBM servers and other high-end computers, as well as chips for other companies, including Apple Computer Inc.


    Krewell said IBM's plant also could manufacture the new Xbox's graphics chips.


    In August, Microsoft selected ATI Technologies Inc. to design — but not make — the upcoming console's graphics system. Nvidia Corp. provided the original Xbox's graphics chip.


    "IBM could wide up supplying the entire silicon for the XBox2," Krewell said.
    Hidden Content

    While Your Guns Are Raisin'-Mine Is Blazin'(RIP DZNUTZ)

  10. #10
    Caffeine Free gerbil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ontario, CANADA
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Originally posted by Cottrau



    two heads are never better than one, unless they work together. Here are two examples

    Working:


    Not Working:


    i rest my case.

    .. word!!
    <[ WSD ]> NTSC Division First Soldier
    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content
    Sniper for Hire

  11. #11
    not not not not not sane. Cottrau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Temple Terrace, FL
    Posts
    147

    Default

    okay, just FMI, did anyone else remember seeing a few months ago something about AMD had signed a deal to supply the beef in Xbox2's Taco?
    got me an xbo
    PGR2: 250,000Kudos and counting.... 25 Platinum awards Hidden Content
    rawr

  12. #12
    ProfessionalComputerGeek Xebec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Fishers, IN
    Posts
    37

    Default

    According to the article, the next XBox will contain an IBM processor as it's main CPU, not Intel and not AMD. It will not be x86 compatible and you won't be able to run any XBox 1 games on it. I think this will be the downfall of XBox. Part of the appeal for game developers is that they can easily port games written for the PC to XBox and vice-versa. That is a huge savings in development costs. Games coded for the PC will have to be re-written from scratch to work on the new XBox. People will say that they don't care about PC games, but part of the reason we're seeing good games for the Xbox is that since the Xbox platform is practically identical to the PC. In fact, the Xbox developement kit is a PC with an Xbox connected to it.

  13. #13

    Default

    Originally posted by Xebec
    In fact, the Xbox developement kit is a PC with an Xbox connected to it.
    That is the case with most consoles though, the PS2 has a similair thing. You can't judge its platform from how it connects to the SDK machine.

  14. #14
    ProfessionalComputerGeek Xebec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Fishers, IN
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Originally posted by Spies
    That is the case with most consoles though, the PS2 has a similair thing. You can't judge its platform from how it connects to the SDK machine.
    My judgement is not based soley on the SDK machine. I was just trying to make a point.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Posts
    4

    Default Xbox 2 - IBM chip or not?

    This makes it sound like the chip issue is still open. Don't throw out your Xbox 1 games just yet...




    http://www.gamespot.com/all/news/news_6078054.html

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Originally posted by Xebec
    According to the article, the next XBox will contain an IBM processor as it's main CPU, not Intel and not AMD. It will not be x86 compatible and you won't be able to run any XBox 1 games on it. I think this will be the downfall of XBox. Part of the appeal for game developers is that they can easily port games written for the PC to XBox and vice-versa. That is a huge savings in development costs. Games coded for the PC will have to be re-written from scratch to work on the new XBox. People will say that they don't care about PC games, but part of the reason we're seeing good games for the Xbox is that since the Xbox platform is practically identical to the PC. In fact, the Xbox developement kit is a PC with an Xbox connected to it.

    Thats a great point, we wouldn't have a lot of great games for the Xbox if PC ports weren't so easy.

    Although, I would laugh my @ss off if the Xbox had those Cell chips with a kick butt ATI gfx card and blew away PS3 with its own technology

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •