Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: MS stakes IP claims on OpenGL

  1. #1
    Portable Mammogramistâ„¢ DrUnKtAnK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    423

    Post MS stakes IP claims on OpenGL

    Microsoft stakes IP claims on OpenGL
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26125.html
    By Andrew Orlowski in London
    Posted: 10/07/2002 at 13:27 GMT
    _________________________________________________
    In January we revealed that Microsoft had acquired a chunk of SGI's graphics portfolio. At the time we mused if the Beast had a plan to scupper OpenGL.

    This was taking paranoia too far, wise heads told us.

    But in the minutes of the OpenGL developer meeting, it's clear that Microsoft has staked an IP claim on portions of the OpenGL spec, and it's willing to license it's patents on RAND terms.

    "Microsoft believes they have patent rights relating to the ARB_vertex_program extension. They did not contribute to the extension, but are trying to be upfront about it. They're offering to license their IP under reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms; will license rights to the extent necessary, provided a reciprocal license is granted to MS. Granted on 1:1 basis for OpenGL 1.3, 1.4, and earlier versions. Contact Dave Aronson for more specifics ... Microsoft does believe they have IP claims against fragment shaders, too."

    This gives the first public indication that hardware manufacturers are beginning to rub up against Microsoft's patent portfolio. Whether the Beast's goal is to kill OpenGL with kindness, or simply to let the GPU manufacturers know who's da boss, we don't know. The wording is misleadingly benign: non-discriminatory licenses are only non-discriminatory until there's some discrimination.

    And right now it's too early to say. All we can see is the shark's fin.

    But we'll be keeping our eyes on two patents filed by SGI - which created OpenGL - particularly this one and this one. If we discover that these have been assigned to Microsoft, it may be time to leave the beach entirely.

    Any views from Linux developers or OpenGL developers on non-Microsoft platforms? ®
    Hidden Content name="quality" value="high">Hidden Content quality="high" pluginspage="Hidden Content type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="180" width="470">

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Ahh... capitalism, don't you just love it?

  3. #3
    Portable Mammogramistâ„¢ DrUnKtAnK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    423

    Default

    Originally posted by khaos2005
    Ahh... capitalism, don't you just love it?
    From my understanding this could be BAD NEWS for the GameCube and it's future....Unless MS got a preliminary injunction against ATI. From what I understand about patent law, for MS to stop Nintendo from getting ArtX cards, MS would have to deny ATI a liscense to use its patents in any form...
    Hidden Content name="quality" value="high">Hidden Content quality="high" pluginspage="Hidden Content type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="180" width="470">

  4. #4
    Registered User Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,820

    Default

    Microsoft should tell Nintendo that all games that use microsoft patent parts of OpenGL have to be recalled and rewriting to not use any of the patent parts!! That would hurt the GC more to have to rewrite all games & SDKs then licence fees!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •