Poll: MGS2:S vs SC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: MGS2:S Vs Splinter Cell

  1. #1
    Registered User Bouchinator33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    14

    Question MGS2:S Vs Splinter Cell

    Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, VS ,Splinter Cell?!

  2. #2

    Default

    Im not too familiar w/ Splinter Cell so i picked MGS2

  3. #3
    Registered User Bouchinator33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    14

    Default

    yeah i picked MGS2:S too, just interested cause this was on another board an i was suprised SC won by like 35-6

  4. #4

    Exclamation

    Splinter cell will blow MGSS away tom clancy dont F around . . . but MGS will be tight as hell so dont get the idea MGSS will suck both games will be awsome . . . but splinter will be better from what iv read
    Your off the squad!
    Take That!

  5. #5
    Frostberg
    Guest

    Default

    Originally posted by OppiumNitrates
    Splinter cell will blow MGSS away tom clancy dont F around . . . but MGS will be tight as hell so dont get the idea MGSS will suck both games will be awsome . . . but splinter will be better from what iv read
    I agree.
    Splinter Cell is already in the top 3, if not the top game at E3...MGS2:S is pretty much a fake game. Loaded with pointless VR missions and crap. MGS was a groundbreaking game, MGS2 was extremely short, but fun. If MGS2:S is long, then it might have a chance...but the online play ALONE of Splinter Cell will far dominate MGS2:S

  6. #6
    Registered User Bouchinator33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    14

    Default

    from the screens i saw of SC (not many), it doesnt look like they could have possible stolen any more ideas from MGS the they did..but i would rather have MGS- ive been a big fan of that series since it first came out, maybe its the story lines, thats atleast one thing i dont think will be better about SC, if that means anything

  7. #7
    Registered User Bouchinator33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    14

    Default

    well, Substance is just a remake, not really a new game so theres alot of people that wont be buying it, so im not sure if its really going to compete with SC that way, but if SC does do good, it would be interesting to see how much stuff MGS3 steals from them(IF there is a MGS3)

  8. #8
    Registered User dave_m123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    Hasent it been reported that the stealth elements in Splinter Cell are many compared to MGS2?

  9. #9
    Registered User Bouchinator33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    14

    Default

    probabily- every SC screen ive seen so far looks like it should be MGS3 or something

  10. #10
    Registered User CodeMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    384

    Default

    I like the look of splinter cell so far

  11. #11

    Default

    Splinter Cell looks amazing.. graphically and idealy. MGSX isn't too far behind though.

  12. #12
    Registered User Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    441

    Default

    I voted for Splinter Cell, MGS2 is a Rip off of Tom Clancy Games , so Who's ripping off who, , I think Splinter cell will be better and have a Better Story, the story for MGS2 IMO is the lamest ever, and the Lamest Names IMO, Tom Clancy get's paid Millions for his Books , theres a Movie out now called "Sum of All Fears" based on his book, (it out sold Episode II this weekend) MGS2 was written By a third grader IMO.

    Splinter Cell is My Most Awaited Title, It has some awesome stuff , the lighting effects alone are awesome , shoot out lights to conceal your self, you have a Stealth Meter to tell how loud you are bieng and whether or not you can bee seen, thats Awesome!!,

    I wanted MGS2 just for game play but After seeing Splinter Cell I changed my Mind ,,,,Maybe MGS2 used for ten bucks I hope the Voice acting is better in Splinter cell than in MGS2,,,
    Wadical Dwagons! *quote from random game nerd in an arcade when I was a kid in the 80's*

  13. #13
    Live Legend Xtopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,308

    Default

    I voted Splinter Cell. I have never played the MGS series, but I have played Tom Clancy games. And I love 'em! So yes, I have some serious faith in Redstorm and Tom Clancy.

  14. #14
    I'm The Backup Liquid Gears's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    1,432

    Default

    Originally posted by Bouchinator33
    from the screens i saw of SC (not many), it doesnt look like they could have possible stolen any more ideas from MGS the they did..but i would rather have MGS- ive been a big fan of that series since it first came out, maybe its the story lines, thats atleast one thing i dont think will be better about SC, if that means anything
    Yeah man!! I totally agree with you. This game is such a rip-off from Metal Gear Solid. There's no way in heII it will kill Metal Gear Solid Substance. It's more like Metal Gear Solid Substance will kill Splinter Cell. My votes going to Metal Gear Solid Substance.

  15. #15

    Default

    i think tom clancy has been around a little bit lionger then MGS
    Your off the squad!
    Take That!

  16. #16
    Take No Tea Hugh_Jass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    2,197

    Default

    I predict Splinter Cell will be better but both games will sell well.

  17. #17
    Halo's Hitman SpartanSniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Palmetto, FL
    Posts
    198

    Exclamation MGS2: S

    Both are going to be great but.......


    ~ SpartanSniper
    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

    "...Fear not; I am the first and the last:"
    Revelation 1:17

  18. #18
    Registered User Halo of Flies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    154

    Default

    What the hell is this osession with Tom Clancy? Games linked to him usually fall a bit short of the mark.

    "tom clancy dont F around" - What are you on about? They guy is just a writer not Mike Tyson...

    "i think tom clancy has been around a little bit longer then MGS" - So what? Should I get my gran to come up with a new stealth game?


    Splinter Cell looks great and I hope it proves itself but I seriously doubt it'll top MGS2.

  19. #19
    Frostberg
    Guest

    Default

    Originally posted by Halo of Flies
    What the hell is this osession with Tom Clancy? Games linked to him usually fall a bit short of the mark.
    Nahhh

  20. #20
    GRAVEDIGGER
    Guest

    Default Hmm...

    Well i voted Splinter cell because i have MGS2 for the PS2 its good, but its not what its cracked up to be, there are way too many cut-scenes and less actual playing time. And you know Splinter Cell is slaying MGS2 when you hear Gamespot(of all people) said that it kills MGS2 in the area of stealth and that its gameplay is just as fun and its not even complete in that area. And they also stated that from the version that they have played the story line rivals the best of its genre. So right now my money's on Splinter Cell.


    Untill next time...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •