Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, VS ,Splinter Cell?!
Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, VS ,Splinter Cell?!
Im not too familiar w/ Splinter Cell so i picked MGS2
yeah i picked MGS2:S too, just interested cause this was on another board an i was suprised SC won by like 35-6
Splinter cell will blow MGSS away tom clancy dont F around . . . but MGS will be tight as hell so dont get the idea MGSS will suck both games will be awsome . . . but splinter will be better from what iv read
Your off the squad!
Take That!
I agree.Originally posted by OppiumNitrates
Splinter cell will blow MGSS away tom clancy dont F around . . . but MGS will be tight as hell so dont get the idea MGSS will suck both games will be awsome . . . but splinter will be better from what iv read
Splinter Cell is already in the top 3, if not the top game at E3...MGS2:S is pretty much a fake game. Loaded with pointless VR missions and crap. MGS was a groundbreaking game, MGS2 was extremely short, but fun. If MGS2:S is long, then it might have a chance...but the online play ALONE of Splinter Cell will far dominate MGS2:S
from the screens i saw of SC (not many), it doesnt look like they could have possible stolen any more ideas from MGS the they did..but i would rather have MGS- ive been a big fan of that series since it first came out, maybe its the story lines, thats atleast one thing i dont think will be better about SC, if that means anything
well, Substance is just a remake, not really a new game so theres alot of people that wont be buying it, so im not sure if its really going to compete with SC that way, but if SC does do good, it would be interesting to see how much stuff MGS3 steals from them(IF there is a MGS3)
Hasent it been reported that the stealth elements in Splinter Cell are many compared to MGS2?
probabily- every SC screen ive seen so far looks like it should be MGS3 or something
Splinter Cell looks amazing.. graphically and idealy. MGSX isn't too far behind though.
I voted for Splinter Cell, MGS2 is a Rip off of Tom Clancy Games , so Who's ripping off who, , I think Splinter cell will be better and have a Better Story, the story for MGS2 IMO is the lamest ever, and the Lamest Names IMO, Tom Clancy get's paid Millions for his Books , theres a Movie out now called "Sum of All Fears" based on his book, (it out sold Episode II this weekend) MGS2 was written By a third grader IMO.
Splinter Cell is My Most Awaited Title, It has some awesome stuff , the lighting effects alone are awesome , shoot out lights to conceal your self, you have a Stealth Meter to tell how loud you are bieng and whether or not you can bee seen, thats Awesome!!,
I wanted MGS2 just for game play but After seeing Splinter Cell I changed my Mind ,,,,Maybe MGS2 used for ten bucks I hope the Voice acting is better in Splinter cell than in MGS2,,,
Wadical Dwagons! *quote from random game nerd in an arcade when I was a kid in the 80's*
I voted Splinter Cell. I have never played the MGS series, but I have played Tom Clancy games. And I love 'em! So yes, I have some serious faith in Redstorm and Tom Clancy.
Yeah man!! I totally agree with you. This game is such a rip-off from Metal Gear Solid. There's no way in heII it will kill Metal Gear Solid Substance. It's more like Metal Gear Solid Substance will kill Splinter Cell. My votes going to Metal Gear Solid Substance.Originally posted by Bouchinator33
from the screens i saw of SC (not many), it doesnt look like they could have possible stolen any more ideas from MGS the they did..but i would rather have MGS- ive been a big fan of that series since it first came out, maybe its the story lines, thats atleast one thing i dont think will be better about SC, if that means anything
i think tom clancy has been around a little bit lionger then MGS
Your off the squad!
Take That!
I predict Splinter Cell will be better but both games will sell well.
Both are going to be great but.......
~ SpartanSniper
Hidden Content
Hidden Content
Hidden Content
Hidden Content
"...Fear not; I am the first and the last:"
Revelation 1:17
What the hell is this osession with Tom Clancy? Games linked to him usually fall a bit short of the mark.
"tom clancy dont F around" - What are you on about? They guy is just a writer not Mike Tyson...
"i think tom clancy has been around a little bit longer then MGS" - So what? Should I get my gran to come up with a new stealth game?
Splinter Cell looks great and I hope it proves itself but I seriously doubt it'll top MGS2.
NahhhOriginally posted by Halo of Flies
What the hell is this osession with Tom Clancy? Games linked to him usually fall a bit short of the mark.
Well i voted Splinter cell because i have MGS2 for the PS2 its good, but its not what its cracked up to be, there are way too many cut-scenes and less actual playing time. And you know Splinter Cell is slaying MGS2 when you hear Gamespot(of all people) said that it kills MGS2 in the area of stealth and that its gameplay is just as fun and its not even complete in that area. And they also stated that from the version that they have played the story line rivals the best of its genre. So right now my money's on Splinter Cell.
Untill next time...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks