i want to get something off my chest... it is this, in the gaming world (a world that i do love so much) games are put into different genre types... some action, some racing, shooting, beat-em-ups.... and that is all well and good, but what i dont like is the way games developers say their game is a SIM... and im sure your aware of the many games being passed off as sims, but the reality is that for something to be a sim it must recreate absolutly everything that it is about... MSs flight simulator 2004 is one of the few sims that deserves to be called ''a sim''... i am currently training up the ranks for a pilots liscence... and in a couple of years hope to have my ATP liscence and a contract with an airline.... okay that isnt my point, my point is that i have used that sim in my training... and it is recognised as a true simulator....
but most other games that call themselves sims are not, they may be as realistic as they could be on a console, but for example WAR games... there are many these days that class themselves as sims, but it is never EVER posibal to simulate war without experiencing it.... also sports games, i have played pro evolution soccer, which is a great game... but what gets to me is the fact that it is called a soccer sim.... it is not posibal, i could score a bicycle kick in pro evo... id have a hard time doing it in a real match!! and this game could be played and mastered by some 400lb overweight monster freak.... but id like to see how hed manage on pixel-less pitch....
okay ive made my point, i love games.... but they should be aknowledge what they are - games- not pretending to recreate what the game is about, as they rarely succeed in doing so...
okay, RANT = OUT.
Bookmarks